Starting in 2025, the Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) and benchmarks for production costs in apparel manufacturing are no longer operational footnotes. They are now strategic elements for determining a brand’s potential, the resilience of the supply chain, and market entry. 

As fashion continues to deal with issues of fragmented demand, sustainability pressures, and geopolitical tensions, the understanding of MOQs and costs, especially in the global environment, remains a necessity, not a luxury.

This report focuses on examining the benchmarks of costs and MOQs in global clothing manufacturing for the year 2025, not as mere numbers, but as the fundamental elements that will continue to define how fashion is produced, scaled, and distributed. It goes deeper to analyze MOQs in relation to the economics of the factory, the manufacturing region’s economic power, the sustainability of the product category, and the brand’s positioning.

It is not a question of where production is economically feasible. This report seeks to answer the question of how economically and ethically viable production is constrained by the thresholds of MOQs and costs.

The Structural Role of MOQs in Global Apparel Manufacturing

Minimum Order Quantities exist because the apparel manufacturing game is all about getting the most bang for your buck. They’re not arbitrary rules made up by factories to keep startups at bay; they’re actually a way to balance the risk, make the most of labour and materials, and keep the supply chain running smoothly.

By 2025, MOQs will have become the gatekeepers of who can even get into the game. They help decide whether a young startup can actually get its products made, if a mid-sized brand can branch out and offer more different products, and whether big retailers can muscle their way to being the cheapest on the market. 

The massive differences in MOQs around the world are just a symptom of deeper issues with infrastructure, how people earn a living, and just how developed the supply chain is.

Factories are using MOQs to:

• Eat into those expensive one-off setup costs (like getting patterns made, programming those machines, and getting the factory floor running like clockwork)
• Keep their production lines running fast and their labour costs in check
• Get their fabric supplies in line with the minimum orders that fabric mills are willing to do
• Cut down on the financial risks they take on when demand goes up and down like a rollercoaster

As a result of all this, MOQs are shaping not just how many products get made, but also what gets designed, how much you can charge, how much risk you carry on your inventory, and even how sustainable your whole operation is.

Global MOQ Landscape in 2025: A Comparative Overview

The MOQ landscape in 2025 is a real patchwork, with different regions having quite different standards. Gone are the days of a one-size-fits-all ‘standard MOQ’. Supplied MOQ expectations have got to be factored in, depending on where you are, the size of the factory, how complicated the garments are going to be, and how much power the buyer has.

Regional MOQ Patterns

Asia is still the big player when it comes to global apparel manufacturing, but the level of flexibility when it comes to meeting minimum orders varies dramatically from one country to another:

Bangladesh is specially geared up for big production runs, and MOQs for basic garments will typically start off at about 500-1,000 units per style.

China is a bit more mixed: you can find small private factories that’ll take as few as 100-300 units per style, but on the other side of the spectrum, some big industrial-scale manufacturers want a minimum of 1,000 units.

India is in the middle, with most factories accepting MOQs of 150-500 units. Basically, they are a lot more flexible than a lot of other places, especially for knit and small export brands.

Vietnam, on the other hand, is pretty focused on putting out performance wear and structured garments, and their MOQs are typically in the 300-600 range.

If you’re looking further afield in Turkey and Eastern Europe, they tend to operate at mid-range MOQs (200-400 units), but the price per unit ends up being a bit higher because of the labour costs and other standards they have to adhere to

In contrast to Asia, like in Europe and North America, a low MOQ of 30-100 units may be supported, but the cost is a lot higher, so that really limits how much economies of scale you can get.

Factory Typologies and MOQ Structures

To understand MOQs, one must not only examine the regions but also the factory typologies. In 2025, the categories of apparel manufacturing that exist will include the following:

Small Workshops and Sampling Units

These facilities operate with greater flexibility as opposed to greater efficiency. They operate with MOQs between 30 and 150 units but will have greater unit costs due to the high manual processing, low levels of automation, and low throughput. They work with early-stage brands and test collections as opposed to scalable production.

Mid-Sized Export Factories

These are the primary exporters of global apparel manufacturing. They operate with an MOQ of between 300 and 3000 units. They balance flexibility with cost, and are the most prevalent manufacturing partners for DTC brands and regional retailers.

Large Vertical Manufacturing Facilities

These are the bulk manufacturers, and will require MOQs of 5000 units, as they only work with multinational retailers and the fast-fashion giants. Their cost advantages are due to high levels of production, vertical integration, and long production runs.

Low-MOQ Specialists

These are the new additions in 2025, and such factories organize their systems for low-volume production, typically with the aid of modular lines and digital systems. Although their MOQs can be as low as 10 to 50 units, their per-item costs will still be high.

Cost Benchmarks in 2025 – Getting Down to the Nitty Gritty of Production Costs

To really understand the cost benchmarks in 2025, you have to think about them in layers, not just look at one single headline figure. That top-line unit cost figure is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to total manufacturing costs. You’ve also got to factor in labor, materials, overhead, compliance, logistics, and all those other hidden costs that add up.

Base Manufacturing Costs by Region (A rough guide)

• For the most basic garments – think cotton T-shirts or jersey tops:
• Bangladesh: anything between $1.50 and $4.00 per item
• India: you’re looking at $2.20 to $4.50 per item
• China: it’s $2.80 to $5.00 per item
• Vietnam: that’s $2.50 to $6.00 per item
• Then you’ve got Turkey and Eastern Europe: that’s $5.00 to $8.00 per item
• And at the high end, you’ve got the US and EU: $8.00 to $15.00 or more per item

However, hold on, these prices all assume you’re referring to the correct Order Quantity. At lower quantities, the prices skyrocket because the fixed costs are spread over fewer and fewer pieces.

The MOQ–Cost Curve: Why Scale Still Matters

Even in 2025, the relationship between MOQ and cost is still understood in fundamentally non-linear ways. While digital tools and flexible manufacturing have lowered the barriers to entry, the domination of economies of scale in apparel production persists.

At lower MOQs:

• Fixed costs can constitute 30-50% of unit costs
• More fabric is wasted
• Less line efficiency

At higher MOQs:

• Fixed costs are diluted
• More efficient fabric sourcing
• Better labor utilization

In the following example, a $1,000 setup cost adds $10 per unit at 100 units, but only $2 per unit at 500 units. This explains why factories avoid ultra-low MOQs unless higher prices are placed on the orders.

Garment Complexity and Its Impact on MOQ and Cost

Not all garments carry the same manufacturing economics. In 2025, garment complexity will be highly impactful on MOQ and cost. Basic knitwear (T-shirts, tanks) always has the lowest MOQ and cost volatility. With sweatshirts and hoodies, MOQs get higher due to increased fabric weight and sewing complexity.

Denim and woven garments come with washing, finishing, and pattern grading. These activities require more investment and impose higher minimums. Outerwear and technical garments frequently demand the use of specialized machinery. MOQs go higher and costs increase even more.

Frequently, factories impose style-specific MOQs. This means a brand with multiple SKUs will have to achieve minimums for each design in addition to the total order volume.

Hidden Costs Beyond the Factory Floor

Many still believe the total cost of sourcing garments is equal to the factory unit cost times the quantity ordered. In 2025, the hidden and indirect costs of sourcing will be more impactful on determining total garment profitability.

Cost layers in a sourcing assignment that go to the bottom line include:

• The cost of sampling and developmental work
• The cost of pattern making and grading
• The cost of quality control (QC) inspections
• Cost related to compliance testing (chemical, safety, social audits)
• The cost of freight and duties, including customs clearance
• The risk associated with inventory holding and the cost associated with inventory markdown

For smaller-sized brands, these non-manufacturing costs, especially at low MOQs, often outweigh the production costs.

Sustainability, Compliance, and Cost Inflation

The notion of sustainability has evolved from just a marketing point of view and is becoming a reality in corporate cost structures. As of 2025, new compliance requirements will directly impact MOQs and unit costs.

Factories making long-term commitments to:

• Traceable materials
• Waste management systems
• Living-wage compliance
• Energy efficiency 

This will often require higher MOQs or premium pricing to alleviate some of their capital costs. This leads to “cheap” manufacturing becoming increasingly associated with a lack of environmental and social compliance, while overpriced and compliant manufacturing continues to be offered.

This new reality will transform sourcing decisions for most brands, especially those with a footprint in the EU and North America.

2025: Strategy over Confrontation for MOQ Negotiation

Negotiating MOQs in 2025 is less about making concessions and more about the redistribution of risk. Leading brands recognize that MOQ negotiations represent the opportunity to forge a partnership rather than a transactional relationship.

Best practices include:

• Establishing a commitment to repeat orders
• Consolidating fabrics across designs
• Agreeing to higher per-unit costs in return for lower first volume requirements
• Providing forecast data
• Synchronizing production calendars with the factory’s capacity

Prioritizing predictability over the margins will be the focus for most factories’ investments.

Cost Benchmarks: What Clothing Really Costs to Produce in 2025

Manufacturing cost in 2025 is no longer defined solely by labor. Instead, it is the cumulative outcome of materials, compliance, logistics, and operational inefficiencies introduced by global volatility.

Indicative Unit Cost Benchmarks (Basic Garments)

These benchmarks assume standard fabrics and exclude freight, duties, sampling, and quality inspections. When fully landed costs are calculated, total expenditure can increase by 20–40%, depending on the destination market and shipping mode.

Regional Power Shifts and Their Impact on MOQs

A major shift in the world’s geopolitics and economy is impacting global manufacturing output the world. Manufacturing requirements such as minimum order quantities (MOQs) are influenced by trade policy, labor shortages, and currency value changes.

Increased production costs in China mean some manufacturing has moved to the South and Southeast Asian countries.

Although costs are higher, Turkey has manufacturing proximity to Europe.

India can contain disruption during global supply chain crises due to its self-sufficient textile supply. 

In retail, the trend of nearshoring (moving manufacturing closer to customers) is advancing, especially in Mexico and Eastern Europe.

All of the aforementioned factors determine costs, but also the MOQs that factories set in response to the changing demand.

Patterns, Comparisons, and Industry Shifts

A comparative study of different regions in the world shows the following for all regions: 

• If flexibility is combined with cost effectiveness, it comes at the price of scale. 
• Market shifts are such that low MOQs encourage innovation for new products. 
• It provides opportunities for testing new products in the market. 
• It provides opportunities for testing new products in the market for niche players. 

On the other hand, high MOQs mean margins are optimized with mass distribution. It is expected that by 2025, market conditions will prevail, and thus brands will operate hybrid sourcing models. In other words, they will combine low MOQs for market testing with high MOQs for core production.

Strategic Implications for Brands in 2025

For fashion brands in 2025, the operating environment will make it such that the MOQs set by the market and the cost standards of manufacturing will impact:

• The timing of market entry, 
• The price tiers that will be set, 
• Product Range offered, 
• The degree of Sustainability, and 
• The reduction of inventories.

Brands that treat MOQs as constraints struggle. Those who treat them as design parameters gain sa trategic advantage.

Conclusion: MOQs as Strategic Infrastructure, Not Just Numbers

In 2025, global clothing manufacturing functions where efficiency alone is no longer enough. MOQs and cost benchmarks are not merely figures, but now function as structural limitations for determining who can scale responsibly, who takes on risk, and how supply chains are organized and empowered.

To contextualize MOQs, one must move beyond simplistic comparisons and into the economics of fabric, the systems of labor, the frameworks of compliance, and the volatility of demand. Brands that tactically approach MOQs as opposed to strategically are likely to have ambition misaligned with the operational reality of a product.

This is why companies like Hula Global, which combine supply chain intelligence with structured sourcing, are more and more important. Hula Global can help brands get around a core barrier of 2025 apparel manufacturing: the need to balance scale, cost, and risk in a way that enables brands to manage excess inventory, adaptable production, and reliable supplier networks.

The industry is in the process of recalibrating; MOQs are still a key, defining constant. In determining how the industry will make clothing, they will also determine who can or cannot take part in global fashion manufacturing.

References & Industry Sources

Business of Fashion (BoF)
Industry analysis on global apparel manufacturing, sourcing strategies, cost pressures, and supply-chain shifts.
https://www.businessoffashion.com

McKinsey & Company – The State of Fashion Reports (2024–2025 Editions)
Comprehensive data on global apparel production costs, manufacturing regions, labor economics, and sourcing trends.
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/state-of-fashion

World Bank – Textile & Apparel Global Value Chain Reports
Macro-level analysis of apparel manufacturing hubs, cost structures, and trade dynamics.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/trade

United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA)
Benchmarking studies on sourcing regions, compliance costs, and manufacturing economics.
https://www.usfashionindustry.com

Global Fashion Agenda (GFA)
Insights on sustainability compliance, cost implications, and manufacturing transformation.
https://www.globalfashionagenda.com

Première Vision Paris (Official Industry Publications)
Textile sourcing data, fabric minimums, and material cost trends influencing MOQs.
https://www.premierevision.com

Pitti Immagine (Trade Fair Documentation & Industry Insights)
Menswear manufacturing, sourcing volumes, and factory capacity dynamics.
https://www.pittimmagine.com

Fashion for Good
Research on sustainable manufacturing models, low-volume production innovation, and cost impact.
https://fashionforgood.com

Ellen MacArthur Foundation – Circular Fashion Reports
Analysis of sustainability-driven cost shifts and production model restructuring.
https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org

International Trade Centre (ITC)
Trade statistics and apparel manufacturing benchmarks by country and region.
https://www.intracen.org

Apparel Resources & Fibre2Fashion (Industry Trade Publications)
https://www.fibre2fashion.com

Programs

• If you are exploring the idea of starting a fashion brand – Join the Masterclass
• If you are 100% sure of launching a clothing brand or are in the process of launching a clothing brand – Join the Bootcamp
• If you are looking for low MOQ supplier, inquire about the Co-pilot program.
• If you have a private label brand and you are looking to scale up – Join our Private Label Program.
• If you are looking for surplus & Liquidation deals – join our liquidation program.
• If you are not sure about joining the bootcamp, – Join the Masterclass to get a feel of what Bootcamp has to offer and if you still have questions, you can email us at hello@hulaglobal.com

Read more

• How To Start A Fashion Brand?
• Top 10 Couture Brands
• How Big of a Deal is the Supply Chain?
• Top 20 Expensive Clothing Brands